Face
processing in humans and new world monkeys:
the
influence of experiential and ecological factors
Julie
J. Neiworth, Janice M. Hassett (2003), and Cara J. Sylvester (2003)
NEW! Published in the journal Animal
Cognition
on-line in August, 2006
in print April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0045-4
Click
here, pdf available -- please seek permission and payment to Animal
Cognition.
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
Also
presented
at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association,
May 9, 2003, Chicago, Illinois.
Click
here for poster in pdf
Findings:
1999-2005
Physical
Cognition
What
is it? |
Abstract
This study tests whether the face-processing system
of humans and a nonhuman primate species share characteristics
that would allow for early and quick processing of socially salient
stimuli: a sensitivity toward conspecific faces, a sensitivity
toward highly practiced face stimuli, and an ability to generalize
changes in the face that do not suggest a new identity, such
as a face differently oriented. The look rates by adult tamarins
and humans toward conspecific and other primate faces were examined
to determine if these characteristics are shared.Avisual paired
comparison (VPC) task presented subjectswith either a human face,
chimpanzee face, tamarin face, or an object as a sample, and then
a pair containing the previous stimulus and a novel stimulus was
presented. The stimuli were either presented all in an upright
orientation, or all in an inverted orientation. The novel stimulus
in the pair was either an orientation change of the same face/object
or a new example of the same type of face/object, and the stimuli
were shown either in an upright orientation or in an inverted
orientation. Preference to novelty scores revealed that humans
attended most to novel individual human faces, and this effect
decreased significantly if the stimuli were inverted. Tamarins
showed preferential looking toward novel orientations of previously
seen tamarin faces in the upright orientation, but not in an
inverted orientation. Similarly, their preference to look longer
at novel tamarin and human faces within the pair was reduced significantly
with inverted stimuli. The results confirmed prior findings in
humans that novel human faces generate more attention in the upright
than in the inverted orientation. The monkeys also attended more
to faces of conspecifics, but showed an inversion effect to orientation
change in tamarin faces and to identity changes in tamarin and
human faces. The results indicate configural processing restricted
to particular kinds of primate faces by a NewWorld monkey species,
with configural processing influenced by life experience (human
faces and tamarin faces) and specialized to process orientation
changes specific to conspecific faces.
|